Nogales, US vs Nogales, MEX
Why Is Latin America Poorer Than North America?
Nogales Case Study
- Interesting case study: two towns, Nogales, with the same culture, but in two different countries.
- One is 5 times wealthier than the other.
- Differences include:
- Infant mortality
- Crime
- Education
- U.S. citizens generally do not live in constant fear that:
- Their homes or businesses will be taken from them
- Their safety will be jeopardized
- Opening a business in many Latin American countries can be risky because entrepreneurs may need to maneuver around bribing corrupt politicians in order to stay open.
Broader Question
- Why is Latin America so much poorer than North America?
Historical Context
Latin America Was Not Always Expected to Be Poor
- This was not always the case.
- Land in Latin America was highly valued by indigenous peoples and early colonizers.
- North America was more sparsely populated by nomadic tribes.
- Huge and complex civilizations existed in what is now Latin America.
Expectations of Greatness
Even in more recent times, countries such as:
- Argentina
- Brazil
- Venezuela
- Mexico
were expected to become global powers.
Venezuela Example
- Venezuela experienced an economic boom in the 1950s.
- It became the third richest country in the world in terms of income per person.
- This wealth came largely from massive oil reserves.
Venezuela Today
- Venezuela is now considered an economic disaster.
- Hyperinflation became so severe that the currency was considered less valuable than toilet paper.
- Millions of people fled the country.
The Broader Pattern
- Venezuela is not unique.
- Most Latin American countries failed to live up to their potential.
- Geographically, South America is arguably better positioned economically than North America.
- Cultural differences do not fully explain the economic gap.
Key Questions
- Why is Nogales, Arizona so much wealthier than Nogales, Sonora?
- Why is North America richer than Latin America?
Spanish Colonization
Argentina and the Search for Wealth
- In 1516, Spanish explorers sailed into modern-day Argentina near the Río de la Plata.
- Spanish explorers were searching for:
- Treasure
- Human labor
Early Problems
- Nomadic peoples refused to cooperate.
- The Spanish wanted silver, but the labor force was unwilling.
Shift Toward Sedentary Societies
The Spanish moved north to find sedentary agricultural societies because:
- They already had hierarchical systems.
- They had ruling elites.
- The Spanish could insert themselves into the top of existing power structures.
Key Idea
- The Spanish specifically sought places with established social hierarchies.
- This allowed them to exploit existing systems for their own benefit.
- The more advanced and organized a society was, the more attractive it became to Spanish conquerors.
The Aztec Empire
- A similar conquest occurred farther north and was even bloodier.
Montezuma and Cortés
- King Montezuma ignored the warnings of his advisors and welcomed Hernán Cortés and the Spanish explorers.
- The Aztec capital city, Tenochtitlán, was quickly seized.
- Montezuma was captured and used as a hostage to extract treasures from the city.
Collapse of the Aztec Empire
- The Aztec Empire soon fell to the Spanish.
- One by one, large and advanced civilizations were conquered, drained of resources, and destroyed.
The Inca Empire
- In 1533, the Spanish massacred a massive Inca army.
- The Spanish replaced Inca elites with their own people.
Silver Extraction
- The Spanish discovered mountains rich in silver.
- Massive amounts of silver were mined using slave labor.
English Colonization in North America
Initial Strategy
- The English also initially tried to conquer indigenous peoples and exploit their labor.
- This strategy failed, just as it eventually did elsewhere.
Why It Failed
- North America was too vast.
- Colonists could simply leave rather than submit to forced labor.
Shift Toward Incentives
As a result, the English changed strategies.
Incentives Included
- Giving land to colonists
- Granting voting rights
- Allowing economic participation
Long-Term Consequences
This became the foundation for:
- Democracy
- Capitalism
- The future United States
Distributed Power and Institutions
Why Distribution of Power Mattered
- Because power became distributed among many people, it became harder for individuals or groups to exploit others for personal gain.
Political Evolution
This process eventually led to:
- The Declaration of Independence
- Constraints on those in power
- Broader distribution of political authority
Protections Introduced
- Property rights
- Patent protections
Result
People became incentivized to invest:
- Time
- Energy
- Resources
- Creativity
into productive work and innovation.
Economic Accessibility in the United States
- Access to patents, loans, and business creation became relatively widespread.
Innovation Statistics
Between 1820 and 1845:
- Only 18% of patentees came from wealthy or connected families.
- Around 40% had only primary schooling.
Example
- Thomas Edison came from a modest educational background.
Outcome
- The United States successfully tapped into the innovation and creativity of ordinary citizens.
- This contributed heavily to the U.S. becoming the wealthiest country in the world.
Latin America After Independence
Colonial Exploitation Continued
- While the U.S. moved toward distributed political power, Latin America remained under colonial-style exploitation.
Conditions
- Locals had little say in government.
- Ordinary people did not gain the same freedoms or rights as northern populations.
- Colonial elites were generally satisfied with Spanish rule.
Napoleon Invades Spain (1808)
- French forces invaded Spain in 1808.
- This weakened Spain’s control over its colonies.
Independence Movements
- Colonial elites across Latin America declared independence largely because they feared losing their own power.
Consequence
Instead of creating strong and fair institutions:
- Many governments became even more tyrannical.
- Political instability increased.
- Corruption spread.
- Dictatorships emerged.
Mexico as an Example
Extreme Political Instability
- Mexico gained independence in 1821.
- Between 1824 and 1867, Mexico had 52 presidents.
Characteristics
- Most leaders came to power through force.
- Property rights became insecure.
- Governments struggled to:
- Collect taxes
- Provide services
- Maintain order
Territorial Losses
- Mexico lost large territories to the United States because it was unable to defend itself effectively.
Weak Economic Institutions
Innovation Was Not Rewarded
- Inventors and entrepreneurs had little confidence they could profit from their ideas.
Banking Problems
- Mexico had very few banks.
- A small number controlled most of the market.
- Interest rates were extremely high.
Consequences
- Loans mainly benefited the wealthy.
- Elites used capital to strengthen monopolies.
Why the U.S. Was Different
- American elites also had incentives to create monopolies.
- However, democratic elections created accountability.
Elections and Competition
- Politicians supporting monopolies could be voted out.
- Candidates opposing monopoly practices often gained popular support.
Land and Economic Opportunity
United States
- Land was often distributed freely to those willing to cultivate it.
Latin America
- Massive amounts of land remained concentrated in elite hands.
- Elites captured most benefits from global trade.
Venezuela and Resource Dependency
Oil Wealth Problems
Venezuela failed to fully capitalize on its oil wealth.
Effects of Oil Dependence
- Oil exports strengthened the currency.
- Other industries became less competitive and weakened.
Government Spending
- Large social spending programs contributed to hyperinflation.
Broader Pattern
This pattern occurred across Latin America with resources such as:
- Precious metals
- Cattle
- Oil
Outcome
- Wealth concentrated among elites.
- Broader economic development stagnated.
Democracy and Corruption
Democratic Institutions Developed Late
- Democracy arrived relatively late in much of Latin America.
- In many places it remained weak or incomplete.
Continuing Problems
- Politicians often remained corrupt and unaccountable.
- Economic institutions stayed closely tied to political elites.
Why Nogales, Arizona Is Richer Than Nogales, Sonora
Institutional Differences
In the United States:
- People can more easily:
- Start businesses
- Buy homes
- Invest confidently
Why?
- Governments are constrained by democratic accountability.
- Politicians depend on votes for reelection.
Protection of Rights
- Property rights are more consistently protected.
- Economic participation is more accessible.
Latin America’s Colonial Legacy
- Many Latin American governments still reflect colonial institutions originally designed to exploit ordinary people.
Political Instability
- Chronic instability weakened central governments.
- Governments struggled to establish law and order nationwide.
Economic Consequences
For ordinary people:
- Starting a business is risky.
- Investment is difficult.
- Monopolies reduce competition.
- Incomes remain stagnant.
Final Argument
Core Thesis
- Latin America was colonized through systems based on exploitation.
- North America increasingly developed through systems based on individual incentives and broader participation.
Key Point
- The differences were not primarily caused by:
- Culture
- Geography
- Spanish vs. English identity alone
Instead
The main difference was the development of:
- Political institutions
- Economic institutions
- Incentive structures
- Distribution of power